Rewrite the Quickstart as a full tutorial. #284
Conversation
WalkthroughThe quickstart documentation was extensively rewritten and expanded into a detailed, step-by-step tutorial. The new guide provides comprehensive instructions for integrating CodeRabbit with a GitHub repository, including repository setup, authorization, adding CodeRabbit, creating and reviewing pull requests, and interacting with CodeRabbit through comments. The tutorial now features structured walkthroughs, code snippets, example comments, and cleanup steps, replacing the previous brief instructions and screenshots. Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (4)
2-4: Frontmatter consistency: update estimated time
Thedescriptionfrontmatter currently states "Get started with CodeRabbit in less than 15 minutes", but the tutorial now includes many detailed steps and may take longer. Consider updating or removing the time‑specific claim to set accurate expectations.
12-15: Use sequential numbering for clarity
All list items are prefixed with1., which is valid Markdown but can be confusing to readers. Consider using1., 2., 3., 4.or explicitly numbering each step for improved readability.
61-73: Fix fenced code block syntax and indentation
The Python snippet uses hard tabs and the code fence lacks a language hint, causing markdownlint errors (MD010, MD040). Replace tabs with spaces (2 or 4 spaces) and specify```pythonfor syntax highlighting. For example:- ``` - # simple_utils.py - A tiny utility library +```python + # simple_utils.py - A tiny utility library ... - ``` +```🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
61-61: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
61-61: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null(MD040, fenced-code-language)
62-62: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
65-65: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
66-66: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
68-68: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
69-69: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
71-71: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
72-72: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
73-73: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
[error] 61-61: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 61-61: markdownlint MD040/fenced-code-language: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified.
[error] 62-62: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 64-64: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 65-65: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 66-66: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 68-68: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 69-69: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 71-71: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 72-72: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 73-73: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
135-139: Use consistent list markers
The final "What's next" section uses-bullets, but earlier lists use*. To satisfy markdownlint MD004 and maintain consistency, switch to*. For example:-* [Integrate CodeRabbit](...) +* [Integrate CodeRabbit](...) -* [Configure CodeRabbit](/getting-started/configure-coderabbit) beyond its default settings. +* [Configure CodeRabbit](/getting-started/configure-coderabbit) beyond its default settings. ...🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
135-135: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
136-136: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
137-137: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
138-138: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
139-139: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash(MD004, ul-style)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
[error] 135-139: markdownlint MD004/ul-style: Unordered list style should be asterisk (*) but found dash (-) on lines 135 to 139.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
static/img/getting-started/quickstart-comment.pngis excluded by!**/*.png,!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~91-~91: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~125-~125: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...uggested docstrings to add-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
61-61: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
61-61: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
62-62: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
64-64: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
65-65: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
66-66: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
68-68: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
69-69: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
71-71: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
72-72: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
73-73: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
99-99: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
99-99: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
100-100: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
101-101: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
103-103: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
105-105: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
106-106: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
107-107: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
108-108: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
109-109: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
111-111: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
115-115: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
115-115: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
116-116: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
117-117: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
119-119: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
121-121: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
123-123: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
125-125: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
135-135: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
136-136: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
137-137: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
138-138: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
139-139: Unordered list style
Expected: asterisk; Actual: dash
(MD004, ul-style)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[error] 61-61: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 61-61: markdownlint MD040/fenced-code-language: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified.
[error] 62-62: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 64-64: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 65-65: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 66-66: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 68-68: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 69-69: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 71-71: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 72-72: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 73-73: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 99-99: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 99-99: markdownlint MD040/fenced-code-language: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified.
[error] 100-100: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 101-101: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 103-103: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 105-105: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 106-106: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 107-107: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 108-108: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 109-109: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 111-111: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 115-115: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 115-115: markdownlint MD040/fenced-code-language: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified.
[error] 116-116: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 117-117: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 119-119: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 121-121: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 123-123: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 125-125: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 135-139: markdownlint MD004/ul-style: Unordered list style should be asterisk (*) but found dash (-) on lines 135 to 139.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (12)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (12)
8-10: Approve new tutorial introduction
The header and introductory paragraph clearly communicate the hands‑on, GitHub‑based approach and set the right expectations for the tutorial.
17-17: Approve completion outcomes summary
This sentence succinctly summarizes the learning outcomes and ties the tutorial flow together nicely.
21-23: Approve note on supported platforms
The callout cleanly highlights that CodeRabbit works beyond GitHub without interrupting the main tutorial.
25-27: Approve prereqs section
The "Before you begin" section provides clear instructions on creating the test repository.
29-35: Approve integration steps
The detailed GitHub OAuth flow (login page, authorize actions) is well‑structured and easy for users to follow.
39-47: Approve repository selection steps
Instructions for adding the test repository (selecting, installing, completing signup) are complete and unambiguous.
51-53: Approve code review initiation
The explanation of triggering CodeRabbit's automated review by creating a pull request is clear and actionable.
57-60: Approve branch and file creation steps
Good demonstration of a typical Git workflow: branch naming, file creation, and commit context.
75-77: Approve commit and PR instructions
The steps for committing toadd-utilsand opening a PR are concise and give users flexibility in messaging.
79-86: Approve CodeRabbit response details
The bullet list accurately describes CodeRabbit’s automated actions and helps users know what to expect.
89-89: Approve screenshot inclusion
Including the example screenshot is a valuable visual aid for understanding CodeRabbit’s review interface.
91-91: Approve screenshot explanation
The caption explains what the screenshot illustrates without excessive detail.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~91-~91: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...(SHOW_INDICATE)
Deploying coderabbit-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
8454225
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://54e54ff8.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://quickstart.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev |
|
@coderabbitai Regarding your "Use sequential numbering for clarity" nitpick, I must respectfully disagree, because the list of |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain@jmacdotorg You're absolutely right about Markdown ordered lists. Using I apologize for the unnecessary suggestion. Thank you for the correction! 🐰💭 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 6651 @jmacdotorg You're absolutely right about Markdown ordered lists. Using I apologize for the unnecessary suggestion. Thank you for the correction! 🐰💭 ✏️ Learnings added
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (1)
121-125: Optional: Vary repeated list-item wording
All three actions start with "CodeRabbit". For readability, consider replacing one occurrence with "It" or another pronoun.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~125-~125: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...uggested docstrings toadd-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
121-121: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
123-123: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
125-125: Hard tabs
Column: 1(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
[error] 121-121: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 123-123: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 125-125: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~91-~91: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~125-~125: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...uggested docstrings to add-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
99-99: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
99-99: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
100-100: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
101-101: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
103-103: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
105-105: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
106-106: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
107-107: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
108-108: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
109-109: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
111-111: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
115-115: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
115-115: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
116-116: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
117-117: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
119-119: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
121-121: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
123-123: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
125-125: Hard tabs
Column: 1
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[error] 99-99: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 99-99: markdownlint MD040/fenced-code-language: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified.
[error] 100-100: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 101-101: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 103-103: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 105-105: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 106-106: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 107-107: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 108-108: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 109-109: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 111-111: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 115-115: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 115-115: markdownlint MD040/fenced-code-language: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified.
[error] 116-116: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 117-117: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 119-119: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 121-121: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 123-123: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
[error] 125-125: markdownlint MD010/no-hard-tabs: Hard tabs found at column 1.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (11)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (11)
2-6: Frontmatter looks good
The frontmatter metadata (title,description,sidebar_label,sidebar_position) is clear and appropriately updated.
8-17: Heading and introductory steps are clear
The main heading and bullet list provide a concise, actionable overview of the tutorial flow. Using repeated1.is a valid markdown auto-numbering technique.
21-23: Note callout is informative
The callout correctly highlights multi-platform support and links to the relevant page.
25-27: "Before you begin" section is clear
The setup instructions for creating thecoderabbit-testrepository are precise and easy to follow.
29-38: Integration instructions are complete
The steps for integrating CodeRabbit with GitHub are well-documented and cover all UI interactions.
39-48: Repository addition steps are clear
The instructions for granting CodeRabbit access to the repository walk the user through each required click.
51-60: Pull request initiation steps are straightforward
Guidance on creating theadd-utilsbranch and addingsimple_utils.pycorrectly triggers the review process.
61-74: Utility code snippet is well-formatted
The embedded Python snippet is properly fenced withpython, and code indentation is consistent.
75-78: Commit and PR creation instructions are good
The steps to commit the new file and open a pull request complete the initial review trigger without ambiguity.
79-87: CodeRabbit response description is accurate
The narrative of how CodeRabbit adds summaries, walkthroughs, and detailed reviews aligns with its expected behavior.
89-93: Screenshot and "Ask CodeRabbit" heading are effective
The example image has a clear alt text, and the transition to conversational examples is smooth.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~91-~91: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...(SHOW_INDICATE)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (2)
57-59: Typo in the branch setup instruction
Line 59 has an extra “g” in “followingg”. Apply this diff:- 1. In that new `add-utils` branch, create a new file called `simple_utils.py`, with the followingg content: + 1. In that new `add-utils` branch, create a new file called `simple_utils.py`, with the following content:
91-91: Consider a stronger verb
Instead of “This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed…”, you might write “This illustrates that CodeRabbit has identified…” to vary the wording:-This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws with this Python library, including a lack of docstrings and input validation. +This illustrates that CodeRabbit has identified some flaws in this Python library, including missing docstrings and input validation.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~91-~91: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...(SHOW_INDICATE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~91-~91: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~125-~125: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ested docstrings to add-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting check failed. Run 'prettier --write' to fix code style issues.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (11)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (11)
2-4: Frontmatter metadata looks good
Thetitle,sidebar_label, anddescriptionfields are clear and accurately describe this tutorial.
8-10: Header and introductory sentence are clear
The# Quickstartheading and overview sentence succinctly introduce the tutorial’s purpose.
12-16: List numbering style is intentional
You’re using1.for each ordered list item as a Markdown maintenance pattern; it renders sequentially in HTML. No changes needed here.
22-22: Note block content is accurate
The note correctly highlights additional supported platforms and links to the right page.
25-27: “Before you begin” section is clear
The section header and instructions for creating the repository are straightforward and error‑free.
29-31: Integration steps heading and intro are correct
Good structure: a clear section header followed by the introductory sentence.
33-35: GitHub integration steps list
The three-step list uses the same1.pattern intentionally; it’s readable and renders correctly.
43-47: “Add CodeRabbit” steps look good
This numbered list is consistent with earlier sections and clearly describes the authorization flow.
61-73: Sample code snippet forsimple_utils.py
The Python code demonstration is well‑formatted and clearly illustrates missing docstrings and validation for the tutorial.
99-101: GitHub comment snippet is correct
The fenced code block usestextas the language specifier and is properly indented under the list.
116-117: “Generate docstrings” command snippet
The second comment example is also correctly fenced and formatted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (4)
57-61: Fix typo in step description
There's a typo in the sentence:…create a new file called `simple_utils.py`, with the followingg content:Change “followingg” to “following”.
81-84: Maintain consistent branding
The first bullet reads “Code Rabbit” (with a space) but the product name is “CodeRabbit”. Update to keep branding consistent:-* If you didn't write a pull request summary, then Code Rabbit adds a new summary… +* If you didn't write a pull request summary, then CodeRabbit adds a new summary…
89-89: Strengthen wording
Consider replacing “This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed…” with “This illustrates that CodeRabbit has noticed…” or “This demonstrates that CodeRabbit has noticed…” to use a stronger verb.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...(SHOW_INDICATE)
119-123: Vary phrasing across bullets
All three bullets start with “CodeRabbit”, which can feel repetitive. Consider combining them into one sentence or rephrasing, for example:* CodeRabbit then creates a new branch based on `add-utils`, commits the suggested docstrings, and opens a pull request between the new branch and `add-utils`.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings toadd-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings to add-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: fix
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (11)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (11)
2-8: Approve frontmatter and heading
The YAML metadata and the main# Quickstartheading are clear and correctly reflect the tutorial scope.
10-16: Ordered list formatting is valid
Using1.for all items in the markdown source is a common and maintainable pattern; it renders sequentially in HTML and simplifies reordering.
25-35: Section headings and integration steps are clear
The “Before you begin” and “Integrate CodeRabbit with your GitHub account” sections are well-structured and give concise, actionable instructions.
41-49: Add CodeRabbit instructions look good
The “Add CodeRabbit to your repository” section provides the exact sequence of clicks and options users need—well done.
61-73: Code snippet is well‑formatted
The Python code fence is correctly specified (python) and indentation is consistent, making the example easy to copy and run.
75-79: Commit and PR creation steps are clear
The instructions for committing the file and opening a pull request are straightforward and precise.
92-96: “Ask CodeRabbit for more information” section is concise
The step numbering and instructions in this section are clear and easy to follow.
97-100: Comment snippet formatting is correct
Thetextcode fence is properly specified, and indentation is normalized—readers will have no trouble copying this.
101-108: Blockquote responses are well-presented
The blockquote examples use correct markdown and convey the interactive behavior cleanly.
111-118: Generate docstrings step is clear
The inline instructions and subsequent bullet list accurately describe how CodeRabbit will create a new branch, commit changes, and open a pull request.
125-128: Cleanup section is good
Instructions on deleting the test repository are straightforward and complete.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (1)
134-134:⚠️ Potential issueFix broken link in "What's next" section
The first bullet points tohttp://localhost:3000/platforms/, which will not resolve correctly in production. Update to a relative path:-* [Integrate CodeRabbit](http://localhost:3000/platforms/) with your repositories on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, or Bitbucket. +* [Integrate CodeRabbit](/platforms/) with your repositories on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, or Bitbucket.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (1)
85-88: Visual review example is helpful
The screenshot and accompanying caption effectively illustrate what users will see on the pull request page. Alt text is present and descriptive.Consider varying the caption verb (e.g., "This illustrates" instead of "This shows") for stylistic variety.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings to add-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting check failed. Run 'prettier --write' to fix code style issues in this file.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (11)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (11)
2-4: Frontmatter updated correctly
The title and description accurately reflect the content of the tutorial and conform to Docusaurus frontmatter standards.
8-17: Introduction is clear and concise
The heading, introductory paragraph, and list of tutorial objectives provide a helpful overview and use the common Markdown pattern of repeating1.for ordered lists, which renders correctly and simplifies maintenance.
22-23: Platform note is concise
The note accurately informs users about supported Git platforms and links to the appropriate page.
25-37: Setup and GitHub integration steps are well-defined
The "Before you begin" instructions together with the "Integrate CodeRabbit with your GitHub account" section clearly guide users through repository creation and authorization. All steps are sequential and actionable.
39-49: Repository onboarding instructions look good
The steps to add CodeRabbit to an existing repository are precise, and the callouts for optional dialogs (e.g., "Complete your signup") are helpful.
51-59: Pull request review initiation is straightforward
The section for triggering the first code review via a pull request is clear, using familiar Git workflows.
61-76: Example code snippet is appropriate
Thesimple_utils.pyexample is well-indented, correctly fenced with thepythonlanguage tag, and deliberately includes missing docstrings and input validation to demonstrate CodeRabbit's review capabilities.
78-84: Commit and initial review action steps are accurate
Clear instructions on committing, opening a pull request, and the expected automated responses from CodeRabbit are provided, preparing the user for the review feedback.
91-108: Interactive Q&A and special commands section is comprehensive
The guide clearly demonstrates how to ask CodeRabbit questions and issue commands (e.g.,@coderabbitai generate docstrings) using properly fencedtextcode blocks.
110-124: Automated branch creation and PR steps are well-documented
The subsequent steps showing CodeRabbit branching, committing changes, and opening a new pull request illustrate the automation flow correctly.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings toadd-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
126-132: Cleanup instructions and readiness note are clear
Users know how to clean up the test repository and move on to other repositories as intended.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (6)
2-4: Refine frontmatter description
The description frontmatter can be more engaging and concise by removing the comma and making the tone more imperative. For example, consider:-description: See CodeRabbit in action, using a live GitHub repository. +description: Experience CodeRabbit in action using a real GitHub repository!
10-10: Tighten introductory sentence punctuation
Remove the comma between “CodeRabbit” and “using” and simplify wording:-This tutorial gives you a hands-on demonstration of CodeRabbit, using a real, GitHub-based repository. +This tutorial gives you a hands-on demonstration of CodeRabbit using a real GitHub repository.
25-27: Clarify repository creation step
The phrasing “let it have otherwise default GitHub settings” is a bit awkward. Consider:-Create a new, private repository on GitHub. Name the new repository `coderabbit-test`, and let it have otherwise default GitHub settings. +Create a new private GitHub repository named `coderabbit-test` with the default settings.
89-89: Strengthen wording
Instead of “This shows that…,” consider a stronger verb:-This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws… +This demonstrates that CodeRabbit has detected some flaws…🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...(SHOW_INDICATE)
117-121: Avoid repetitive phrasing
All three bullets start with “CodeRabbit.” To improve readability, consider:-* CodeRabbit creates a new branch, based on `add-utils`. -* CodeRabbit commits changes to the branch that adds suggested docstrings to `add-utils`. -* CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the new branch and `add-utils`. +* It creates a new branch based on `add-utils`. +* Commits the suggested docstrings to that branch. +* Opens a new pull request to merge the updates into `add-utils`.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings toadd-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
129-135: Unify trailing slash style in links
The first link includes a trailing slash but the others do not. For consistency, consider:-* [Configure CodeRabbit](/getting-started/configure-coderabbit) +* [Configure CodeRabbit](/getting-started/configure-coderabbit/) -* [Add custom review instructions](/guides/review-instructions). +* [Add custom review instructions](/guides/review-instructions/) -* [Get support for CodeRabbit](/getting-started/support). +* [Get support for CodeRabbit](/getting-started/support/) -* [Learn more about how CodeRabbit works](/overview/why-coderabbit). +* [Learn more about how CodeRabbit works](/overview/why-coderabbit/)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings to add-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting check failed. Run 'prettier --write' to fix code style issues in this file.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (13)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (13)
12-16: Ordered list numbering is intentional
Using a repeated1.for each list item is valid Markdown and improves maintainability; the rendered HTML will auto-sequence numbers.
17-17: Looks good
The closing sentence succinctly summarizes the tutorial benefits and flows well.
22-22: Approve note block
The note clarifies multi‑platform support clearly and the syntax is correct.
29-35: Integration instructions look clear
The step-by-step guide for integrating CodeRabbit with your GitHub account is concise, accurate, and easy to follow.
41-47: Repository installation steps are clear
These instructions correctly walk the user through granting repo access via the CodeRabbit dashboard.
51-53: Code review initiation section
The heading and accompanying description accurately introduce how to trigger a code review—great clarity.
55-73: Sample code and workflow are correct
The Git commands, branch naming, and Python snippet illustrate the example well. Indentation and fencing follow Markdown best practices.
75-78: Commit and pull request steps
Straightforward and accurate instructions for committing your changes and opening a PR.
91-93: Q&A section is clear
The guidance on conversing with CodeRabbit and issuing commands reads well and is actionable.
95-99: Example comment formatting looks good
The fenced code block is correctly indented and specifies thetextlanguage.
101-108: Reply example is clear
The blockquote demonstrates a realistic bot response; indentation and formatting are correct.
111-115: “generate docstrings” snippet is clear
The user command is presented with proper fencing and language specifier.
123-127: Cleanup instructions are concise
The steps to delete the test repository when finished are clear and easy to follow.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (1)
89-89: Consider strengthening the verb in this sentence
Instead of “This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed…”, you might use “This demonstrates that CodeRabbit identified…” to add more impact.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...(SHOW_INDICATE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings to add-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[warning] 1-1: Prettier formatting check failed. Run 'prettier --write' to fix code style issues.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (16)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (16)
2-4: Frontmatter metadata is clear and concise
Thetitleanddescriptionfields accurately reflect the purpose of this page. The new description succinctly previews the hands‑on nature of this tutorial.
8-8: Main heading updated correctly
Switching the top‑level heading to# Quickstartaligns with the file name and helps readers orient themselves immediately.
10-10: Introduction sentence is engaging and clear
This line effectively sets expectations for a step‑by‑step, real‑world demonstration.
12-15: Task list formatting is good and leverages Markdown’s “1.” shorthand
Using “1.” for all items keeps source maintenance simple and renders correctly as a numbered list.
18-18: Completion sentence reads well
This summary of learning outcomes provides a clear transition into the rest of the content.
22-22: Note block correctly highlights cross‑platform support
The callout succinctly informs users that GitLab, Azure DevOps, and Bitbucket are also supported.
25-25: “Before you begin” section is appropriately placed
Setting up the repository upfront is logical and aligns with user expectations.
33-35: Integration steps are clear and sequential
The numbered list for GitHub login, OAuth authorization, and consent flows reads naturally.
43-47: Repository‑addition instructions are concise and actionable
Each step in selecting and authorizing thecoderabbit-testrepository is well explained.
59-59: Branch creation step is straightforward
Guiding users to createadd-utilsis clear and sets up the demo pull request.
61-75: Sample Python snippet demonstrates the baseline code under review
- Properly indented under the list item for readability
- Fenced with
pythonfor syntax highlighting- Deliberately omits docstrings/input validation on some functions to illustrate CodeRabbit’s suggestions
77-77: Pull request creation instruction is clear
Users know exactly how to open the PR that triggers CodeRabbit’s analysis.
80-83: Bullet list of CodeRabbit’s initial review actions is well‑formatted
The unordered list clearly communicates the bot’s summary, walkthrough, and detailed review comments.
97-99: GitHub comment snippet for querying CodeRabbit is properly fenced
Usingtextas the language specifier is correct for non‑code comments.
113-115: Fenced snippet for thegenerate docstringscommand is accurate
Maintains consistency with the previous comment example.
119-121: Follow‑up actions list is consistent and parallel
The bullets (“creates”, “commits”, “opens”) are all in present tense and clearly describe CodeRabbit’s automated branches and PRs.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...gested docstrings toadd-utils. * CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (2)
89-89: Use a stronger verb in the explanatory sentence
Consider replacing "This shows" with a more descriptive verb to tighten the prose.Apply this diff:
- This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws with this Python library, including a lack of docstrings and input validation. + Here, CodeRabbit identifies some flaws with this Python library, including a lack of docstrings and input validation.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...(SHOW_INDICATE)
123-128: "Clean up" section content
Consider also guiding users to revoke the CodeRabbit GitHub app or uninstall the integration if they no longer need it.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md
[style] ~89-~89: Consider using a different verb to strengthen your wording.
Context: ...g-started/quickstart-comment.png) This shows that CodeRabbit has noticed some flaws ...
(SHOW_INDICATE)
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ggested docstrings to add-utils. - CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (22)
docs/getting-started/quickstart.md (22)
2-4: Frontmatter updated correctly
Thetitleanddescriptionfields are well‑defined, which ensures proper metadata for the page.
8-8: Main heading is consistent with title
The H1# Quickstartaligns perfectly with the frontmatter title.
10-16: Introduction and ordered list formatting
The overview paragraph clearly sets expectations, and using repeated1.items is acceptable since Markdown auto‑numbers them in the rendered output.
22-23: Note block is properly formatted
The admonition block uses the correct:::notesyntax and references the Git platforms clearly.
25-27: "Before you begin" section
This preliminary section succinctly describes repository setup requirements.
29-31: "Integrate CodeRabbit with your GitHub account" section
The header and introductory sentence guide the user effectively into the integration steps.
33-35: Integration steps list formatting
Each step is clear, and repeated1.numbering is fine for maintenance; links and button labels are accurately presented.
37-37: Integration completion message
The transition sentence smoothly indicates that the dashboard is ready.
39-41: "Add CodeRabbit to your repository" section
The header and preamble clearly introduce the next logical phase of the tutorial.
43-47: Repository addition steps list
Steps for selecting and authorizing the repository are concise and accurate.
49-49: Ready to use message
This affirmation sets the user up for the upcoming code‑review demonstration.
51-53: "Let CodeRabbit perform a code review" section
The section header and introduction clearly explain the action the user is about to take.
57-57: Branch creation instruction
The command to createadd-utilsis straightforward and fits the narrative.
59-63: File creation instruction and code fence
The fenced block specifiespythonand is indented correctly under the list item, ensuring proper rendering.
64-73: Sample Python code snippet
The example utilities illustrate typical issues (missing docstrings/input validation) very well.
75-77: Commit and pull request instructions
The steps for committing and opening a PR are clear and flexible about the commit message.
79-83: CodeRabbit response description
The bullet list effectively communicates the automated actions performed by CodeRabbit on the PR.
93-99: "Ask CodeRabbit for more information" section
Thetext‑fenced code block accurately demonstrates how to prompt the bot, and the instructions are clear.
101-107: Blockquote response example
The quoted reply is well‑formatted and illustrates a natural conversation flow.
111-115: "generate docstrings" snippet
The second command snippet is properly fenced and instructs the user to trigger automated docstring generation.
117-121: Docstring generation follow‑up steps
The bullet list clearly outlines the subsequent automated actions CodeRabbit takes after the command.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~121-~121: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ...ggested docstrings toadd-utils. - CodeRabbit opens a new pull request between the ne...(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
129-135: "What's next" section
The list of additional resources is well‑structured with relative links pointing to the correct docs.
|
@coderabbitai resolve |
✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
This rewrite of the Quickstart recasts the page as a tutorial, guiding the reader through letting CodeRabbit review a simple code change that they make to a test repository, and then chatting with the bot a bit.
This builds on the current Quickstart by continuing to demonstrate the ease of GitHub integration, and then immediately following up by prompting to user to make a small, specific pull request and observe how CodeRabbit responds. It also nudges the reader to try talking with CodeRabbit further and letting it generate docstrings, demonstrating some of its secondary features.
Preview: https://quickstart.coderabbit-docs.pages.dev/getting-started/quickstart